← Journal partnerships

Harrowell partnership

Society & institutional publishing

Publishing partnerships designed around scholarly governance, institutional purpose and long-term value.

The strategic context

Publishing arrangements that serve scholarly purpose and institutional responsibility.

Societies and institutions need more than a publishing supplier. They need an operating arrangement that respects the journal's scholarly purpose, the authority of its editors and the organisation's responsibilities to its community. Harrowell works with scholarly organisations to create practical, accountable models for operations, technology and development without diluting editorial independence.

For societies and institutions

A publishing arrangement should reflect who the journal serves.

Scholarly purpose

The operating model should support the organisation's discipline, community and publishing goals—not force them into a generic supplier process.

Editorial authority

Editorial judgement belongs with the people appointed to exercise it. Service design should make that authority clear, visible and workable.

Accountable delivery

Teams need named responsibilities, useful management information and a dependable route for decisions, exceptions and escalation.

Durable capability

Technology, workflow and metadata choices should protect the published record while giving the programme room to develop over time.

A clear operating boundary

Define what remains with the organisation and what can be managed through Harrowell.

A good partnership does not blur ownership. It records the decisions, responsibilities and information routes that allow editorial leaders, society staff and publishing teams to work confidently together.

Your organisation retains

  • Scholarly purpose, community priorities and the journal's long-term direction
  • Appointment and oversight of editorial leadership and boards
  • Approval of the policies, budgets and decisions that remain with the organisation
  • The organisation's relationship with members, researchers, funders and institutional stakeholders

Harrowell can coordinate

  • Editorial-office, peer-review, production and author-support operations
  • Publishing technology, OJS/PKP implementation, metadata and platform continuity
  • Operational reporting, service reviews and a clear route for issue resolution
  • Practical planning for improvement, portfolio development and future change

A more useful first brief

Start with enough context to make the first conversation productive.

Purpose and portfolio

The journal's subject area, audience, publishing objectives and whether the requirement concerns one title or a wider programme.

Governance and people

Editorial-board structure, internal decision makers, current roles and the level of support that is needed around them.

Current publishing position

Existing publisher or suppliers, platform, submission process, production schedule, backlogs and any live dependencies.

The decision ahead

The outcome sought, critical dates, procurement or approval requirements, risks and the information needed to make progress.

What Harrowell brings

Clarity across the whole partnership.

We connect editorial purpose, publishing delivery, technology, information and governance. That gives the people responsible for the journal a single operating view, even when the work involves multiple teams, systems or stages of change.

The engagement architecture

Structured around the work that determines a successful outcome.

Governance, editorial authority and decision rights

Establish the roles of the society or institution, editorial board, journal office and publishing partner. Agree the decisions that remain with the organisation, the work that can be delegated and the routes for review or escalation.

Publishing operations and community service

Build a dependable operating rhythm for manuscript handling, peer review, production, author communication, issue planning and quality assurance—designed around the expectations of the journal community.

Technology, metadata and the published record

Set up or strengthen the platform, structured metadata, publishing workflows and continuity arrangements that keep content accessible, discoverable and operationally manageable.

Programme review and institutional value

Use reporting and regular governance conversations to review service quality, workload, investment priorities and opportunities across a single title or a wider portfolio.

The partnership outcome

Built for the next stage, not only the immediate task.

  • A publishing model that serves the organisation's scholarly mission
  • Editorial authority and partnership responsibilities made explicit
  • Operational visibility for staff, boards and journal leadership
  • A practical basis for sustainable programme development

Discuss a partnership

Start with the journal, its context and the future you want to build.

Harrowell can help assess the opportunity, establish the right operating model and manage the work that follows with care and accountability.

Start a conversation →